Intelligent design theorists make no scientific attempt to give evidence for it. No, instead they use teleological argumentation, which Carneades’s argument notes as begging the question of agency -intent and Lamberth’s teleonomic/atelic argument illustrates as contradicting science.

     As with any other form of theistic evolution, it’s just an oxy-moronic obfuscation!

     Instead of that design and agency, exist patterns and the non-planning natural causes.

     ID adds nothing to science or to philosophy.

     See more on this @ Theo-sophical Ruminations where I take on the supernaturalists. See how Jason and Danzil, the owners and others try to answer my fulminations against agency and other matters there. Post here and at that blog,please!