Archive for février 2012

ID fails!

     Intelligent design theorists make no scientific attempt to give evidence for it. No, instead they use teleological argumentation, which Carneades’s argument notes as begging the question of agency -intent and Lamberth’s teleonomic/atelic argument illustrates as contradicting science.

     As with any other form of theistic evolution, it’s just an oxy-moronic obfuscation!

     Instead of that design and agency, exist patterns and the non-planning natural causes.

     ID adds nothing to science or to philosophy.

     See more on this @ Theo-sophical Ruminations where I take on the supernaturalists. See how Jason and Danzil, the owners and others try to answer my fulminations against agency and other matters there. Post here and at that blog,please!

Advertisements

Davis on the Rationality of Belief in the Resurrection

Davis on the Rationality of Belief in the Resurrection

viaDavis on the Rationality of Belief in the Resurrection.

viaDavis on the Rationality of Belief in the Resurrection.

We have no  reason to trust the misanthropc writers of the Gospels who are anonymous. Any use of witnesses would be hearsay,not allowed in courts! Why would any rational person give credence then to this mythic- appearing accounts?

Billy Lane is such a fool for embracing the Resurrection as fact!

The Bible and Interpretation – Why We Must Treat the Bible No Differently Than Any Other Book

The Bible and Interpretation – Why We Must Treat the Bible No Differently Than Any Other Book

viaThe Bible and Interpretation – Why We Must Treat the Bible No Differently Than Any Other Book.

viaThe Bible and Interpretation – Why We Must Treat the Bible No Differently Than Any Other Book.